
Although I have mentioned the Olympics before, today I researched more extensively exactly what the Vancouver Olympics (3 weeks away!) have done, and continue to do, to aid in the achievement of this goal. In 1992, the Olympic Committee called on its participating nations to observe the Olympic Truce. Less than one year later the General Assembly of the UN adopted a resolution in which member states declare a truce one week prior and after each Olympic event. The agenda item was passed without vote. Because of their shared vision and goals the United Nations flag has been present at every Olympic event since 1998.
Last October, the UN passed the resolution for the 2010 Vancouver Olympic and Paralympic Games. The assembly recognized the efforts to use sport as a tool of peace.

As you may remember from the conflict in Georgia that began on the same day the 2008 Beijing Olympics, countries do not always adhere to the resolution.
The ideal of global partnership instituted by the IOC is not solely defined by borders or the countries the athletes represent. One major goal of VANOC is to include the aboriginal population of Western Canada in the festivities. Some of the endeavors being undertaken by VANOC include the Aboriginal Youth Sport Legacy Program, which encourages aboriginal youth to pursue recreational activities like sports. VANOC has also partnered with the Aboriginal Sport Circle, Canada’s largest advocate of aboriginal sport.
VANOC also looks to further tourism revenues for indigenous people of the area, and has additionally created educational programs to educate the youth of this population in an effort to better include them in global partnerships. VANOC heavily emphasizes the importance of art inclusion in its festivities, and has subsequently created numerous cultural development programs through means such as art and dance.In addition to this display of global partnership, the General Assembly decided to give me a going away present by holding the first meeting of 2010, and therefore the only I was able to attend. The two resolutions on the agenda both concerned Haiti and the effort to relieve and redevelop the nation once the recovery process is able to get a handle on the conditions on the island nation.
The Global Partnership of the United Nations has been evident amid the horrific tra
gedy that Haiti has faced. Evidence of this is seen by the array of nations who have offered personnel, supplies, and condolences to the country. In today’s General Assembly speaking nations included: Sudan, Uruguay, Saint Lucia, Sri Lanka, Australia, and the Holy See just to name a few.Accompanied by these unifying resolutions was some bickering by a few member states. It began when Nicaragua spoke of the need to ensure that this resolution was not an invitation for foreign militaries to descend on Haiti. The representative proclaimed that Haiti now needed doctors, engineers, and teachers more than it needed foreign troops. Later on, Bolivia seconded the notion and called for foreign nations to forgive any outstanding debt to Haiti (the country currently owes 38 million dollars to the World Bank alone). Bolivia also stated that during the reconstruction process there must not be an overabundance of global interference as reconstruction must be done by Haitians, for Haitians. If this is not ensured than the country will always be reliant on foreign support. Afterwards, the representative from Venezuela accused the United States of using the tragedy as a reason to militarily occupy Haiti.
Before I go any further, I just want to point out that neither Nicaragua nor Bolivia called out any countries in particular when displaying concerns over military and global interference.
Later in the morning, the representative from the United States spoke and called the three countries by name, referring to their statements as “undignified” and “ridiculously misinformed”. He stated that this meeting was not the place for those member states to push their political agendas.
When it came time for replies both Nicaragua and Bolivia defended their remarks. The representative of Nicaragua stated that this was what happened in the 1972 when her country was struck by an earthquake. The representative from Bolivia then questioned the United States as to why in a time when Haiti is short of food and medical supplies the valuable airstrip was being used to funnel over 11,000 United States soldiers onto the island. He then asked if these troops answered to the United Nations mandate or the United States government.

The U.S. representative confirmed that the troops were there as a request of Haitian president, René Preval, and were there to serve humanitarian needs. He never addressed who they answered to.
It was refreshing to hear some of the delegates speak candidly, but also disheartening to hear unnecessary squabbling that in the end will detract from the last MDG. I agree with the concerns of Nicaragua and Bolivia, and wish that the U.S. would have been able to take the constructive criticisms in stride.

Today's General Assembly left a bit of a sour taste in my mouth on my experience at the United Nations. I have learned so much about the inner-working of this organization and specifically its utilization of leisure. Borrowing from Dr. McGann’s presentation yesterday, there are Think-Tanks and there are Do-Tanks. Sadly, the UN Headquarters is only a think-tank, but the many, many NGOs, IGOs, and agencies in developed and developing countries are the do-tanks that fuel the UN. Millennium Development Goals, like global partnership, may be constructed in the Security Council or General Assembly, but the achievement of these goal happens elsewhere.


Lastly, I went to an 

























Something else I wanted to research today was the United Nations effort to 








